Good morning!
It’s Friday April 10.
The newsletter arrives in your inbox this week with a slightly altered, hopefully, for the better, graphical design. Maybe you’ll notice the differences, maybe not.
Finally, the nights here in southern Sweden are staying above 0 degrees Celsius. Spring has taken its time this year, but it is very welcome.
Have a wonderful weekend!
Phil
Word of the week
PÅHITTIG [POH-hit-ig]
inventive; resourceful.
Sweden’s Climate Math Under Scrutiny as Government Claims Questioned
Sweden’s government says emissions are heading in the right direction—but a closer look at the numbers suggests a more complicated reality, raising questions about how progress is being presented ahead of the next election.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and Climate Minister Romina Pourmokhtari have both argued that Sweden’s greenhouse gas emissions will be lower in 2026 than when the government took office in 2022, with emissions decreasing in three out of four years. On paper, that’s accurate—but analysts say it risks giving a misleading impression of overall progress.
Based on the government’s own projections, total emissions over the full four-year term are expected to be slightly higher than if levels had simply remained unchanged since 2022. In other words, while emissions may dip in certain years, those reductions are offset by increases elsewhere—flattening the overall trajectory.
That matters because Sweden has historically reduced emissions every parliamentary term since the 1990s, regardless of which party has been in power. Now, forecasts suggest emissions in 2026 will land roughly at the same level as in 2022, marking a break from that downward trend.
The government acknowledges in its latest climate report that current policies are unlikely to meet national or EU climate targets for 2030 and beyond. Still, Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson has emphasized that the “direction of travel” remains the key metric.
The debate ultimately hinges on framing: is holding emissions steady a sign of stability—or stagnation? With uncertainty in the forecasts and political stakes rising, Sweden’s climate record is becoming an increasingly contested battleground.
In other news
👶 The Tidö parties propose doubling the number of publicly funded IVF treatments to help address Sweden’s low birth rate. The plan would increase the number of subsidized attempts from three to six, with nearly 330 million kronor allocated in the spring budget to fund the reform. Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson says the goal is to make it easier and more affordable for people to have children, as IVF treatments can otherwise be very costly.
🗺️ Maria Malmer Stenergard says that Sweden is prepared to contribute to securing shipping in the strategically important Strait of Hormuz following a ceasefire between United States and Iran. She emphasizes the need for restraint from all parties to protect regional stability, global supply chains, and civilians. Sweden is also participating in international discussions with around 30 countries on how to reopen the route, potentially contributing through political or other appropriate measures.
🚔 A Swedish man with ties to a criminal network in Huddinge has been arrested in Phuket, Thailand. He is wanted in Sweden for weapons offenses linked to a high-profile murder case on Årstabron in 2020 and has previously been convicted of several serious violent crimes. According to reports, he was detained in a luxury apartment and is expected to be deported back to Sweden after facing charges for overstaying his visa.
Cold Case Breakthrough: Arrest Made in 20-Year-Old Swedish Double Murder
After two decades of unanswered questions, Swedish prosecutors have arrested and detained a man suspected of a long-unsolved double murder—offering a potential turning point in a case that has haunted both investigators and victims’ families.
In a development that feels almost cinematic, Swedish authorities have moved forward in the so-called Brattås case, detaining a suspect in connection with a double murder that has remained unsolved for roughly 20 years. The man, whose identity has not been publicly detailed, denies any wrongdoing but has now been formally remanded in custody on probable cause.
The arrest marks a significant moment in one of Sweden’s lingering cold cases, where advancements in forensic methods and renewed investigative efforts appear to have paid off. Prosecutors argue that the evidence has reached a threshold sufficient for detention, signaling growing confidence in the case after years of stagnation.
For the victims’ relatives, the news is both emotional and disorienting. One family member described spending two decades grappling with the same unresolved questions: who committed the crime—and why. Now, those questions may finally be addressed in court.
Prominent criminologist Leif GW Persson expressed surprise at the breakthrough, noting that cases of this age rarely see such decisive progress without new technical evidence or witness developments.
While the legal process is still in its early stages, the arrest has already reignited public attention and raised expectations. After 20 years in the dark, Sweden may finally be closing in on answers—though the outcome now hinges on whether prosecutors can turn suspicion into conviction.
Swede-ish Notes
Plugged In — or Not Quite
Not long ago, Sweden seemed firmly on track toward an electric future.
Charging stations appeared almost overnight — at gas stations, shopping centers, along highways stretching through forests and farmland. The assumption was clear: the electric car boom wasn’t just coming, it was inevitable. All that was needed was the infrastructure to support it.
And then, something stalled.
Recent figures suggest that public fast-charging stations are used only around eight percent of the time — far below what is considered sustainable for continued expansion. In other words: the chargers are there, but the cars haven’t arrived in the numbers expected.
Part of the explanation is domestic. Policy shifts — removed subsidies, lower fuel taxes — have made traditional petrol and diesel cars relatively more attractive again. The anticipated “tipping point” has been postponed.
But there is also a broader backdrop.
The recent energy turbulence following the conflict involving Iran, Israel and the United States has added another layer of uncertainty. Even with a fragile ceasefire now in place, energy markets remain sensitive, prices volatile, and long-term expectations harder to pin down.
In that kind of environment, big transitions tend to hesitate.
What we are seeing, perhaps, is not a reversal — but a pause. Infrastructure built for a future that is still coming, just not quite on schedule.
There is something almost symbolic in those empty charging stations. They stand as quiet reminders of how difficult it is to time change correctly. Build too late, and you fall behind. Build too early, and you wait.
For now, Sweden seems to be waiting.
The question is not whether the shift will happen — but whether the country will still be ready when it does.
Do you have a story from the past that could be worth sharing? Or would you like to leave a suggestion? Please reach out!

